Semington is described by the Parish Council as having an ‘actively rural’ character and this is a key element of the draft neighbourhood plan. But what is actively rural? This is how we explained it to the Examiner of the plan in late 2024:
“Actively rural” has two overlapping components. Firstly, it is a realistic description of the parish in that it is not only predominantly rural in nature but also remains agricultural in that the land is still actively farmed with landowners working across the wider parish that surrounds the three settlements of Semington, Little Marsh and Littleton. There are also other agriculture-based businesses within the parish. It is of huge importance to the Parish Council that this remains the case.
Our opposition to the speculative developments we have faced over the last 10 years has been as much about maintaining a viable agricultural base as it has about keeping housing development as organic as possible. Secondly, it is also a realistic description of life in the parish where residents are physically active in the community and environment. The parish has a large number of public rights of way and no one in the parish lives far from easy access to the countryside and the natural world.
Thus “actively rural” also means maintaining and improving access to our large rights of way network, which includes farmland and canal and river walks. Working with local landowners is a priority for the Parish Council to keep paths open and make improvements such as replacing stiles with kissing gates so that less mobile parishioners can use more of the network.
Hence it is a priority for the Parish Council to resist suburbanisation and seek to maintain our community's ready connection with nature and our agricultural heritage. This guides the Parish Council’s decision-making when we consider any development and associated issues such as access, signage, lighting and rights of way.
..................................................
It's fair to say that the Examiner was not convinced by these arguments. He wrote:
"The Parish Council has placed great weight on its description of the character of Semington as “actively rural”. That phrase appears in numerous places and in different policies in the plan. I appreciate that it is an adjective which has strong connotations for the Parish Council, but I need to be satisfied that it is an accurate description, with specific policy implications that a decision maker will both understand and be able to interpret, establishing its expectations arising from that choice of words, when it comes to determining a planning application. Would they recognise what is meant by its “active rural character”, how is it unique to Semington and how should it be a determining factor when considering a planning application, compared to what is generally understood as “rural character”?
I have given this topic much thought and whilst the recognition of the role of agriculture in the local environment, whether it be for economic or landscape purposes, does not in itself differentiate the character of Semington parish from other rural areas. In my experience, most rural areas will to be some extent actively farmed. Similarly, the proximity of the countryside with its rights of way network is no different within this parish compared to other rural parishes, in my opinion.
I can understand the Parish Council's desire to resist suburbanisation but that can be achieved through, for example, establishing a settlement boundary policy which determines where countryside policies will and will not apply. I do not see that the use of the term “actively rural character” offers any greater protection to the countryside areas than would otherwise be covered by rural planning policies which are set out in the NPPF and the Core Strategy. I have seen no convincing evidence to justify imposing more restrictive planning policies in the plan area either in terms of economic activity, landscape, recreation or other measures which would support taking a different approach than say, other nearby parishes. I have concluded that the reference to “actively rural nature” does not provide the decision maker with the necessary clarity as to how development proposals should be determined, nor has it been supported by convincing evidence justifying a higher threshold, in terms of development management in Semington parish. I will therefore be recommending that reference to “actively rural” nature be changed to remove reference to “actively”. That will remove any ambiguity in terms of how issues around the rural nature of the parish should be dealt with."
...............................................
You'll have a view as to the strength and appropriateness of this argument. The outcome of it, however, is that the version of the Plan that goes forward to the 2025 Referendum will still refer to Semington's having an ‘actively rural’ character in the opening, context sections, but not in the policy sections which developers and Wiltshire Council planners will have to use in decision-making.